Match the terms with their definitions.

Learning objectives

After studying this unit, you should be able to:

· examine topics and predict content related market structures;

· apply reading skills to comprehend, analyze, summarize and interpret texts· related to market structures (i.e. recognize main ideas in paragraphs, definitions, explanations, examples, classifications, comparisons and contrasts, sequence of events, cause/effect, pros and cons);

· identify the main ideas, recall important details of a listening segment· pertaining to different types of market structures, take notes from spoken context as well as relate new information to previously acquired concepts;

· give spontaneous and prepared monologs, dialogues, and group interaction· using topical vocabulary;

· summarize, annotate, render and translate texts related to the issued covered· in the unit.

Key terms

1. Study key terms and their definitions before reading Text A & B:

Market – ринок – an arrangement that allows people to make exchanges with one another; whenever and wherever people voluntarily make exchanges with one another.

Competition – конкуренція – the rivalry among buyers and among sellers in the purchase and sale of resources and products.

Perfect competition – досконала конкуренція – a market for uniform products with many buyers and sellers, none of whom is able to affect the price.

Market structure – ринкова структура – the way in which market is organized, including the concentration of suppliers or consumers, the ease of entry or barriers to entry, and the competitiveness of players in the market.

Monopolistic competition – монополістична конкуренція – a market in which many firms are selling similar but not identical products.

Product differentiation – диференціація (індивідуалізація) продукції – process of creating uniqueness in a product.

Oligopoly – олігополія – market dominated by a few large firms.

Monopoly – монополія – market in which there is only one seller.

Natural monopoly – природна монополія – market structure in which average costs of production are lowest when all output is produced by a single firm.

Geographic monopoly – географічна монополія – market situation where a firm has a monopoly because of its location or the small size of the market.

Technological monopoly – технологічна монополія – market situation when a firm has a monopoly because it owns or controls a manufacturing method, process, or other scientific advance.

Government monopoly – урядова монополія – monopoly created and/or owned by the government.

Economies of scale – економія за рахунок зростання масштабів виробництва – reductions in cost resulting from large scale production.

Patent – патент – a monopoly to use a new product or invention exclusively for a period of time.

Copyright – авторське право – exclusive right of authors of original writing and artistic work to sell or reproduce their works for their lifetime plus 50 years.

Franchise – франшиза, ліцензія – a license to operate an individually owned business in a specific geographic area as if it were a part of a large chain.

Match the terms with their definitions.

3. Read the text to be ready to answer the questions given after the text:

Text A

When economists talk about market structure they mean the way companies compete with each other in a particular market. Let’s take the market for pizzas, for example. There may be many thousands of small companies all trying to win a share of the pizza market, or there may be only one huge company that supplies all the pizzas. Market structure, or the nature and degree of competition among firms doing business in the same industry, is important because it affects price. In some market structures, companies have more control over price. In other market structures, consumers have more control over price. Economists group firms into four different market structures that reflect the competitive conditions in those markets.

Perfect competition is a market structure characterized by a large number of well-informed independent buyers and sellers who exchange identical products. It represents a theoretically ideal situation that is used to evaluate other market structures. In order for a market to have perfect competition, it needs to meet five necessary conditions that other market structures lack.

The first condition is that there must be a large number of buyers and sellers. The second condition is that buyers and sellers deal in identical products. The third condition is that each buyer and seller acts independently. The fourth condition is that buyers and sellers are reasonably well-informed about products and prices. And the last, fifth condition is that buyers and sellers are free to enter into, conduct, or get out of business. Few perfectly competitive markets exist because it is difficult to satisfy all five necessary conditions. Local vegetable farming, sometimes called “truck” farming, comes close.

Although perfect competition is rare, it is important because economists use it to evaluate other, less competitive, market structures. Imperfect competition is the name given to any of three market structures – monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly – that lacks one or more of the conditions required for perfect competition.

Monopolistic competition is the market structure that has all the conditions of perfect competition except for identical products. Under monopolistic competition, products are generally similar and include things such as designer clothing, cosmetics, and shoes. The monopolistic aspect is the seller’s ability to raise the price within the narrow range. The competitive aspect is that if sellers raise or lower the price enough, customers will ignore minor differences and change brands.

Monopolistic competition is characterized by product differentiation – real or perceived differences between competing products in the same industry. Most items produced today – from the many brands of athletic footwear to personal computers – are differentiated.

To make their products stand out, monopolistic competitors try to make consumers aware of product differences. They do this with nonprice competition – the use of advertising, giveaways, or other promotions designed to convince buyers that the product is somehow unique or fundamentally better than a competitor’s.

In a monopolistic competitive industry, advertising is important. This explains why producers of designer clothes spend so much on advertising and promotion. If a seller can differentiate a product in the mind of the buyer, the firm may be able to raise the price above its competitors’ price. Because advertising is expensive, it raises the cost of doing business for the monopolistic competitor, and hence the price the consumer pays.

Oligopoly is a market structure in which a few very large sellers dominate the industry. The product of an oligopolist may have distinct features, as do the many models of cars in the auto industry; or it may be standardized, as in the steel industry. As a result, oligopoly is further from perfect competition than monopolistic competition.

Because oligopolists are so large, whenever one firm acts, the other firms in the industry usually follow – or they run the risk of losing customers. The tendency of oligopolists to act together often shows up in their pricing behavior, such as copying a competitor’s price reduction in order to attract new customers. Because oligopolists usually act together when it comes to changing prices, many firms prefer to compete on a nonprice basis by enhancing their products with new or different features. If an oligopolist finds a way to enhance a product, its competitors are at a disadvantage for a period of time. After all, it takes longer to develop a new physical attribute for a product than it does to match a price cut.

At the opposite end of the spectrum from perfect competition is monopoly. A monopoly is a market structure with only one seller of a particular product. This situation – like that of perfect competition – is an extreme case. In fact, any modern economy has very few, if any, cases of pure monopoly – although the local cable TV operator or telephone company may come close. Consequently, when people talk about monopolies, they usually mean near-monopolies.

We have few monopolies today because people traditionally have disliked them and have tried to outlaw them. Another reason is that new technologies often introduce products that compete with existing monopolies.

Words and phrases to be remembered:

a share – частина, частка

to share – ділитися, розподіляти

huge – величезний

to supply – постачати

nature and degree of competition – природа та ступінь конкуренції

to do business – вести справи

to affect – впливати

to reflect – відображати

identical product – однаковий, ідентичний товар

to evaluate – оцінювати

in order to – для того, щоб

condition - умова

to lack – відчувати нестачу, бракувати

to deal in smth– торгувати чимось

to deal with smth – займитися чимось

to enter into business – входити у бізнес

to conduct business – вести справи

to get out of business – виходити з бізнесу

although – хоча

rare – рідкісний

to require – вимагати

except for – за винятком

to raise – піднімати, підвищувати

product differentiation – індивідуалізація (диференціація) продукту

to perceive – усвідомлювати, відчувати

advertising – рекламування

promotion – просування

hence – отже

distinct features – відмінна риса

to run the risk – ризикувати

behavior – поведінка

price reduction – зниження ціни

to attract – приваблювати

to enhance – збільшувати, посилювати, покращувати

attribute – властивість, ознака

to match – протиставляти, підходити, відповідати, співставляти, співпадати

consequently – в результаті

to outlaw – оголошувати поза законом

Не нашли, что искали? Воспользуйтесь поиском: