Определите, соответствуют ли данные высказывания содержанию текста. Исправьте неверные утверждения.

1. The claimant bought sandwiches at a drive-through McDonald’s.

2. She didn’t have to have medical treatment for 2 years.

3. McDonald’s wanted to give her $800.

4. Liebeck and her lawyer tried a few more times to reach a settlement.

5. Liebeck filed a suit for active McDonald’s negligence.

6. The evidence didn’t show that McDonald’s did actually serve their coffee much too hot.

7. The court found McDonald’s knew their coffee was injuring people.

Просмотрите образцы иска в гражданский суд США и образец иска в Арбитражный суд РФ. Изучите и сравните их форму и структуру. Определите, в чем состоит сходство и различие по форме и содержанию иска в гражданский суд США и иска в Арбитражный суд РФ.

Образец 1.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, Sandy Jenkins, by and through their undersigned attorneys, Ronald V. Miller, Jr., and Miller & Zois, LLC, bring suit against Defendant Conectiv Energy and states as follows:
1. Plaintiff is a resident of Mt. Carmel, Pennsylvania..
2. Defendant Conectiv Energy carries on regular and substantial business in Baltimore City, Maryland.
3. On July 3, 2004 at 11:05 p.m., at 13601 Philadelphia SB Avenue in Ocean City, Maryland, Plaintiff suffered serious and permanent injuries as the result of an explosion that occurred on Defendant’s electrical pole (Conectiv pole 62496/95862 located on the bay side of 135th Street).
4. The explosion caused a cylinder measuring two inches long and 3/8 inches wide to become imbedded in Plaintiff’s right forearm.

Не нашли, что искали? Воспользуйтесь поиском: